🔗 Share this article Relatives' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family. An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades. A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward. “Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Past One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground. “It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.” A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved. “It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.” In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.” Seeking Answers and Clarity An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried. Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near. “The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.” He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.” “There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.” The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.